Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 30 days ago, 27 days ago, 26 days ago, 25 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 19 days ago, 18 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 12 days ago, 11 days ago, 10 days ago, 10 days ago, 5 days ago, 2 days ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 22:35
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 285
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 1,050
97% 809 Pts
64-Core 1,507
93% 1,507 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Lighting 221
Reflection 302
Parallax 224
180% 249 fps
MRender 313
Gravity 176
Splatting 131
160% 207 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 159%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 684 663 664 663 660 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,247
Write 2,154
Mixed 1,264
SusWrite 635
351% 1,575 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 78.8
261% 89.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,114
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 938
702% 943 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 252%
Great: 340%
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$70
888GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 464 481 481 480 482 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 477
Mixed 361
SusWrite 474
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 47.3
161% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 278
228% 325 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 121%
Gigabyte GP-ASM2NE2512GTTDR 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1962 926 566 567 564 568 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,124
Write 1,488
Mixed 1,212
SusWrite 859
265% 1,171 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 56.2
192% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,283
DQ Write 929
DQ Mixed 1,030
790% 1,081 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 206%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4800 C17 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 47.4
MC Mixed 34
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 50.9
SC Mixed 32.8
100% 35.1 GB/s
Latency 48.4
83% 48.4 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,846 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $897
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback