Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star US Desktop Aegis R
MotherboardMSI PRO B660M-A CEC WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D37)  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 03:23
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700F-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 65.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 253
78% 146 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 590
63% 503 Pts
64-Core 823
51% 823 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 166
Parallax 175
143% 172 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 144
Splatting 108
113% 142 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 126%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M390 1TB
843GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EHFM31.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,479
Write 2,432
Mixed 1,298
390% 1,736 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 65.6
242% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 893
DQ Write 678
DQ Mixed 768
579% 780 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 362%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
817GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2639
Write 3,013
Mixed 2,848
636% 2,834 MB/s
4K Read 76.6
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 106
345% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 989
DQ Write 756
DQ Mixed 895
663% 880 MB/s
Poor: 266% Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 21.8
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 18 110 58 165 31.5" 2560 1369 MSI6DC1 G321CQP E2
Typical PRO B660M-A CEC WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D37) Builds (Compare 1,211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 111%
Desktop 109%
Workstation 120%

Motherboard: MSI PRO B660M-A CEC WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D37)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $533
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback