Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory16.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181217
Uptime16.4 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 05:46
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 86.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 237
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 788
75% 620 Pts
64-Core 1,220
76% 1,220 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3906) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 203
Parallax 191
170% 201 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 148
Splatting 133
126% 158 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 144%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
51GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,314
Write 1,148
Mixed 1,095
264% 1186 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 55.6
186% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 683
514% 689 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 99 98 96 95 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 490
Write 276
Mixed 231
SusWrite 110
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 33.7
115% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 244
210% 311 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$52
103GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 202 201 205 208 204 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 447
Write 410
Mixed 256
SusWrite 211
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 39.4
129% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 284
226% 316 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 105%
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
67GB free
Firmware: S9FM02.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 129 119 128 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 417
Write 145
Mixed 116
SusWrite 125
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 16.2
84% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 84.5
DQ Mixed 8
33% 74.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
762GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 95 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 97.6
Write 108
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 94
70% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 36.1
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 30
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 103%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ7F2B BenQ XL2720Z
Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $779
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback