Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 168%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
26 days ago, 25 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P  (all builds)
Memory54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220216
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 02:17
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$179
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 88.6
1-Core 177
2-Core 345
109% 204 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1237
115% 960 Pts
64-Core 1,588
98% 1,588 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 216
Parallax 225
186% 223 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 157
Splatting 140
133% 167 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 155%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,560
Write 1,634
Mixed 1,203
327% 1,466 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 74.9
283% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,001
DQ Write 1,026
DQ Mixed 947
730% 991 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 237%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
91GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 448 462 470 472 474 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 475
Mixed 447
SusWrite 464
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 56.4
199% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 297
244% 350 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 127%
Great: 125%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
303GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 490 490 492 491 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 492
Mixed 457
SusWrite 490
110% 489 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 62
210% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
WD Green SN350 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2210 2216 2208 2208 2205 2206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 1,852
Write 2,253
Mixed 2,016
SusWrite 2,209
472% 2,083 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 83.7
289% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,461
DQ Write 1,158
DQ Mixed 1,251
952% 1,290 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 357%
Great: 390%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 154 157 154 160 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 48.4
Write 81.2
Mixed 62
SusWrite 156
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 144 149 150 149 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 71.8
Write 135
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 148
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
204% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36.2
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 31.3
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 39.9
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 12 60 31.5" 2560 1440 VTK3200 GN32DR
Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P Builds (Compare 2,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback