Dell OptiPlex 9010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
24 days ago, 15 days ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 9010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9010  (all builds)
Memory18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170510
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 11:53
Run Duration332 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50% Above average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 42
2-Core 85.8
45% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 337
26% 232 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 50%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 39.9
Parallax 38.2
30% 38.2 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 26.9
27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 250
Write 292
Mixed 230
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 8.9
32% 9.7 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 35.2
DQ Mixed 71
56% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 111%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
179GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 345
Write 293
Mixed 293
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 10.9
39% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 47.1
DQ Mixed 56.6
57% 95.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
309GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 59.7
Write 60.1
Mixed 38.5
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 63%
Jmicron Generic 1TB
152GB free
Firmware: 0208
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 136
Write 147
Mixed 53.6
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
184% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 79%
Seagate Portable 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 53.3
Write 22.5
Mixed 20.7
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 67%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
101GB free, PID 55a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
1% 0.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-442.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.9% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 32" 1280 720 OPT3635 Optoma HD65
Typical OptiPlex 9010 Builds (Compare 3,931 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback