Asus ProArt Z490-CREATOR 10G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ProArt Z490-CREATOR 10G  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '22 at 23:42
Run Duration846 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 164
2-Core 311
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 1204
107% 906 Pts
64-Core 1,980
123% 1,980 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 146
Parallax 135
110% 138 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 140
Splatting 121
103% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,426
Write 1,932
Mixed 1,697
448% 2,018 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 83.2
273% 93.6 MB/s
DQ Read 860
DQ Write 674
DQ Mixed 735
558% 756 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
174GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1162 509 402 403 402 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,042
Write 829
Mixed 906
SusWrite 546
186% 831 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 78
258% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 961
DQ Write 706
DQ Mixed 806
610% 825 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 193%
Great: 280%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
632GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 446 444 446 443 446 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 506
Write 451
Mixed 411
SusWrite 446
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 21.5
101% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 36.3
83% 166 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 100%
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
35GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 483 483 481 481 456 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 480
Mixed 438
SusWrite 478
107% 477 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 50.9
171% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 352
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
985GB free
Firmware: CC62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 157 155 153 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 152
Write 146
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 154
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 114%
Jmicron Generic 1TB
634GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 156 144 161 161 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 121
Write 78.7
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 154
68% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
423GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 99 98 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 106
Write 115
Mixed 62
SusWrite 98.7
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 29.2
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 28.8
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProArt Z490-CREATOR 10G Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ProArt Z490-CREATOR 10G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,819
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback