Monster ABRA A5 V16.6

Performance Results

Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V16.6  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V16.6
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 12:22
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10200H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 113
2-Core 218
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 632
61% 501 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8535) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 3.9
2% 22.3 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 6.1
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 270 219 216 215 212 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,432
Write 882
Mixed 939
SusWrite 234
193% 872 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 68.7
249% 94 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 832
DQ Mixed 578
485% 697 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 182%
Great: 199%
Jmicron Generic 1TB
419GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 13 13 15 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 39.4
Write 39.7
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 13.1
24% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.1% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 7.4
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V16.6 Builds (Compare 767 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V16.6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback