Axioo Pongo 760

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAxioo Pongo 760  (all builds)
MotherboardAxioo Pongo 760
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 02:37
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 62
1-Core 114
2-Core 263
76% 146 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 902
85% 707 Pts
64-Core 1249
77% 1249 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 A552) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GB
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7801Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,403
Write 2564
Mixed 2,393
549% 2,453 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 89.6
289% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,076
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 930
701% 944 MB/s
Poor: 166% Great: 433%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 36
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1556 N156HMA-GA1
Typical Pongo 760 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

System: Axioo Pongo 760

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback