MSI MS-1581

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star Katana GF66 11UE
MotherboardMSI MS-1581  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220628
Uptime17 Days
Run DateApr 20 '23 at 13:45
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 61.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 204
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 458
49% 391 Pts
64-Core 659
41% 659 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12EA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 121
Parallax 11.3
8% 47.3 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 0.3
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1621 1637 1051 80 77 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,677
Write 1,589
Mixed 1,382
SusWrite 758
303% 1,351 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 34.5
174% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 796
DQ Write 636
DQ Mixed 715
536% 716 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 196%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 21.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 11.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1581 Builds (Compare 4,974 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-1581

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback