Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display7680 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 17:50
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 142
61% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 400
40% 327 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Device(4D50 4449) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 221
Reflection 194
Parallax 204
180% 206 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 154
Splatting 136
131% 164 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xg7000-1tb 2280 1TB
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN13683
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 663
Write 597
Mixed 618
140% 626 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 54.9
178% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 423
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 371
276% 367 MB/s
Poor: 213% Great: 598%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
303GB free
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,054
Write 931
Mixed 952
218% 979 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 41
133% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 443
DQ Write 99.7
DQ Mixed 174
153% 239 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 284%
Intel 330 Series 180GB
167GB free
Firmware: 300i
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 379
Write 107
Mixed 154
46% 213 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 16.4
65% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 51.9
DQ Mixed 65.8
57% 88.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 83%
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1032 512GB
285GB free
Firmware: 20140000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 659
Write 589
Mixed 603
138% 617 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 46.5
152% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 392
293% 392 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 204%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
197GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 110
Write 101
Mixed 76.2
71% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
746GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 168
Write 147
Mixed 96.3
102% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB
589GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 54.6
Write 56.9
Mixed 40.2
64% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 62%
WD 4000BEV External 400GB
147GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.5
Write 39
Mixed 24.7
43% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.8% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 18.4
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 31 144 72.1" 1280 720 NVS10DE NV Surround
Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback