Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display7680 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160106
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 05 '24 at 02:32
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 129
61% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 370
37% 303 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Device(4D50 4449) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.61
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.5% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 30
24% 30 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 30
Splatting 30
25% 30 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xg7000-1tb 2280 1TB
469GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN13683
SusWrite @10s intervals: 540 565 556 573 575 573 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 667
Write 592
Mixed 614
SusWrite 564
137% 609 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 48.6
167% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 405
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 356
265% 352 MB/s
Poor: 213%
This bench: 129%
Great: 598%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
251GB free
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 845 628 553 584 553 559 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 1,045
Write 878
Mixed 930
SusWrite 620
195% 868 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 41.1
132% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 432
DQ Write 99.5
DQ Mixed 174
152% 235 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 133%
Great: 284%
Intel 330 Series 180GB
167GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 104 107 107 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 379
Write 104
Mixed 147
SusWrite 102
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 17
66% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 50.8
DQ Mixed 65.9
57% 87.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 83%
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1032 512GB
285GB free
Firmware: 20140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 536 545 544 553 563 557 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 628
Write 570
Mixed 596
SusWrite 550
132% 586 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 44.8
146% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 428
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 379
281% 373 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 121%
Great: 204%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
197GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 75 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 108
Write 102
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 73.6
65% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
746GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 159 159 159 160 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 159
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 160
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
235% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB
717GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 73 70 70 71 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 54.3
Write 50.6
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 70.3
73% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 62%
WD 4000BEV External 400GB
147GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 50.8
Write 36.5
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 35.9
48% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.7% Average
MC Read 21
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.9
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 30 144 72.1" 1280 720 NVS10DE NV Surround
Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback