Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display7680 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160106
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateMar 26 '24 at 16:19
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 135
62% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 396
40% 326 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Device(4D50 4449) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 205
Parallax 198
174% 205 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 149
Splatting 132
127% 159 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 146%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xg7000-1tb 2280 1TB
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN13683
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 492 571 584 590 591 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 682
Write 608
Mixed 629
SusWrite 540
138% 615 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 55.9
180% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 403
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 351
263% 351 MB/s
Poor: 213%
This bench: 132%
Great: 598%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
303GB free
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 670 606 587 574 573 536 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,072
Write 1,043
Mixed 971
SusWrite 591
207% 919 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 42
136% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 437
DQ Write 99.7
DQ Mixed 174
152% 237 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 134%
Great: 284%
Intel 330 Series 180GB
167GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 82 86 86 89 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 392
Write 104
Mixed 145
SusWrite 83.6
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 18.9
69% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 52.4
DQ Mixed 62.9
56% 87.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 83%
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1032 512GB
285GB free
Firmware: 20140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 527 579 573 577 580 580 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 673
Write 603
Mixed 607
SusWrite 569
138% 613 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 46.6
151% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 438
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 393
292% 387 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 126%
Great: 204%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
197GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 79 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 109
Write 98.8
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 79.6
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
746GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 158 163 161 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 152
Mixed 97.6
SusWrite 160
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB
613GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 95 90 86 89 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 96.2
Write 96.1
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 91
114% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 62%
WD 4000BEV External 400GB
147GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 38 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 51.1
Write 36.6
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 37.6
49% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.5% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 18.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 32 144 72.1" 1280 720 NVS10DE NV Surround
Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback