Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive13.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime15 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 18:21
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 68%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 204
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 280
34% 261 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1314 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.7% Average
Lighting 49.9
Reflection 60.4
Parallax 74
41% 61.4 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 45.1
44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 17 16 11 7.9 10 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13.8% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 87.7
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 15.5
12% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 9.1
35% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 10
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 12.5
10% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 102%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
40GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 394 413 418 419 425 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 420
Mixed 404
SusWrite 409
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 37.4
123% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 292
237% 336 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
43GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 72 72 70 69 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 85.1
Write 96.2
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 70.4
57% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
74GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 107 107 107 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 78.1
Write 74.7
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 107
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
68.7% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 24.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 23.5" 1920 1017 AOC2401 24G1WG4
Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback