Micro Venus Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 30 days ago.
SystemMicro Venus Series  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen AHBTB
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230810
Uptime21.2 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 08:08
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 74.8
1-Core 178
2-Core 360
106% 204 Pts
4-Core 661
8-Core 974
102% 817 Pts
64-Core 1,206
75% 1,206 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 19
14% 19.7 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 5.9
3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0 512GB
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 339 212 292 586 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 581
Write 2,156
Mixed 711
SusWrite 352
217% 950 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 95.1
247% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1376
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 320
435% 811 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 172%
Great: 399%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WPBH32D408SWM-16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 37.2
111% 39 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 43.1
SC Mixed 26
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2701 27B1
Typical Venus Series Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Micro Venus Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback