Besstar HM90

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBesstar HM90  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR HM90
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '23 at 16:44
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 56.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 289
85% 164 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 915
89% 730 Pts
64-Core 1420
88% 1420 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 30.3
18% 24.1 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 24.8
Splatting 19.6
16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 20GB
18GB free
Firmware: S5FA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 68 66 68 70 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 120
Write 80.7
Mixed 108
SusWrite 68.3
21% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 12.3
58% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 54.5
DQ Write 49
DQ Mixed 15
21% 39.5 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 37%
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-A01 512GB
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1025 443 269 261 264 261 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,098
Write 951
Mixed 998
SusWrite 421
194% 867 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 48.8
162% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 853
DQ Write 511
DQ Mixed 779
554% 714 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 150%
Great: 222%
Samsung 870 EVO 500G 500GB
259GB free
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 428 422 434 437 357 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 401
Mixed 396
SusWrite 419
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 47.3
154% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 281
211% 282 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 105%
Great: 121%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
555GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 28.4
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 26
6% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 11.1
44% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 16%
Great: 96%
Inateck ASM225CM 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 181 180 185 188 190 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WPBH32D408SWM-16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 30.7
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 16.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 45 30 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F33 U32J59x
Typical HM90 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Besstar HM90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback