Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 15 days ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	19.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180830
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '24 at 16:17
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$245 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Memory 85.9 1-Core 142 2-Core 284 93% 171 Pts	4-Core 564 8-Core 920 91% 742 Pts	64-Core 1050 65% 1050 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.9% Excellent	Lighting 100 Reflection 110 Parallax 101 82% 104 fps	MRender 95.4 Gravity 97.5 Splatting 97.7 79% 96.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59 34,063 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,399 Write 958 Mixed 1,140 328% 1,499 MB/s	4K Read 52.8 4K Write 99.3 4K Mixed 60.8 210% 71 MB/s	DQ Read 832 DQ Write 704 DQ Mixed 487 442% 675 MB/s
Poor: 139% Great: 271%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 139GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 275 275 274 275 273 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 460 Mixed 386 SusWrite 278 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 77.9 4K Mixed 47.9 161% 54.8 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 227 205% 312 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 118%
X16 Plus SSD 1TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 316% 651GB free Firmware: SN11273 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2158 2088 2063 924 720 683 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	299% Outstanding	Read 2,300 Write 2,224 Mixed 1,935 SusWrite 1,439 444% 1,974 MB/s	4K Read 54.7 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 68.6 226% 76.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1356 DQ Write 821 DQ Mixed 1,120 826% 1,099 MB/s
Poor: 271% ↑ This bench: 299% Great: 507%
SSD 512GB 512GB 6,819 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 268GB free Firmware: FW200326 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 29 4.2 4.4 37 4.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	35% Below average	Read 479 Write 149 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 19.3 35% 163 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.4 55% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 211%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 77GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 160 134 119 140 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 184 Mixed 107 SusWrite 135 113% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 229% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 112GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 122 122 123 123 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 159 Write 139 Mixed 80.9 SusWrite 123 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMW8GX4M1Z3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMW8GX4M1Z3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.7% Good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 22 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 25.5 SC Mixed 21.5 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	49	13	60	27"	1280 720	AOC2702 27G2G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $245Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,873x
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,720x
Core i5-9600KIntel $136Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,086x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	485x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	457x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	379x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	307x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	229x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	208x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	192x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	158x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $861

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16