User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 160%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMACHINIST
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-MR9A PRO MAX
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230429
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 01 '24 at 10:43
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 199
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 796
70% 597 Pts
64-Core 1,833
113% 1,833 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Palit(1569 2204) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 257
Reflection 291
Parallax 360
209% 302 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 259
Splatting 191
210% 268 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 188%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 297 299 299 299 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 452
Mixed 443
SusWrite 302
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 42.3
140% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 354
266% 354 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 129%
X16 Plus SSD 1TB
642GB free
Firmware: H230407a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1809 1830 1843 1812 1519 1421 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2,106
Write 1,918
Mixed 1,927
SusWrite 1,706
431% 1,914 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 57.4
186% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 771
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 639
450% 580 MB/s
Poor: 235%
This bench: 271%
Great: 325%
Seagate ST1000VX001-1HH162 1TB
674GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 166 164 165 166 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 148
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 166
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.3% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 23.5" 1280 720 VSC2528 VX2451 SERIES
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback