Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DRD-iF
Memory	21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180910
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '24 at 04:13
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 66.5 1-Core 67.9 2-Core 157 55% 97.2 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 582 53% 445 Pts	64-Core 1,491 92% 1,491 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 2974) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.4% Average	Lighting 59.3 Reflection 67.1 Parallax 60.3 48% 62.2 fps	MRender 63.2 Gravity 62.8 Splatting 53.9 48% 60 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 682GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR045 SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 408 410 412 289 299 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 348 Write 402 Mixed 356 SusWrite 371 84% 369 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 28.1 93% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 160 132% 188 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 401GB free Firmware: M3CR045 SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 414 412 413 308 313 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Read 350 Write 411 Mixed 356 SusWrite 379 85% 374 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 36.8 4K Mixed 31.7 100% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 160 138% 204 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 125%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 924GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 99 103 96 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 115 Write 121 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 99.4 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.5% Below average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 13.4 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 6 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 96.7 41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	27.9"	1280 720	ACI28A3 ASUS PB287Q

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	4x
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	4x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	2x

SSD
SSD 128GBOrtialBench 77%, 204 samples	4x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	2x
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5773DH0-CK0 8x2GBSamsungBench 90%, 10 samples	3x
9965516-113.A00LF 4x8GBKingstonBench 54%, 11 samples	3x
HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 64%, 62 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16