User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MACHINIST
Motherboard	MACHINIST X99-RS9
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230908
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '24 at 18:27
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 365 User benchmarks, average bench 83% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 79 1-Core 107 2-Core 213 75% 133 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 789 72% 606 Pts	64-Core 1,097 68% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 367A) CLim: 1629 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30% Below average	Lighting 30.7 Reflection 66.5 Parallax 43.5 25% 46.9 fps	MRender 51.6 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 53.5 40% 47.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$45 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 046 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,250 Write 2,284 Mixed 2,914 695% 3,149 MB/s	4K Read 373 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 207 909% 242 MB/s	DQ Read 805 DQ Write 389 DQ Mixed 449 372% 547 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
CT500P3SSD8 500GB 13,020 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 73GB free Firmware: P9CR311 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1685 Write 2014 Mixed 1,740 407% 1,813 MB/s	4K Read 51.8 4K Write 84.2 4K Mixed 61.4 202% 65.8 MB/s	DQ Read 836 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 512 396% 555 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 305%
Toshiba MK3276GSX 320GB-$13 4,568 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 112GB free Firmware: 1X SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 73 73 74 74 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 75.5 Write 78.2 Mixed 23.4 SusWrite 72.3 45% 62.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 47%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 163GB free Firmware: 1H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 87 101 102 102 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 108 Write 101 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 99.2 70% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 69%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 23GB free Firmware: 1A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 39 40 40 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 38 Write 38.2 Mixed 30 SusWrite 39.3 27% 36.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64% Good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 18.7 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 16.3 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 82.1 49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	61	41	60	32"	1280 720	CHO0030 Smart TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16