MSI B250 PC MATE (MS-7A72)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A72
MotherboardMSI B250 PC MATE (MS-7A72)  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '24 at 18:34
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 265
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 729
72% 586 Pts
64-Core 732
45% 732 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$550
Asus(1043 895A) ≥ 4GB; E3267U-C DUAL-RTX4070-O12G-EVO
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 268
Reflection 258
Parallax 304
219% 277 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 240
Splatting 188
205% 261 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 191%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
104GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 800 601 596 591 563 528 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 2,176
Write 1,760
Mixed 1,269
SusWrite 613
324% 1,455 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 69.2
224% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,024
DQ Write 476
DQ Mixed 775
568% 758 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 228%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,319
Write 1,748
Mixed 1,305
396% 1,791 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 67.1
218% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 948
DQ Write 447
DQ Mixed 725
530% 707 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
337GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 356 356 357 366 358 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 367
Write 416
Mixed 314
SusWrite 363
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 45.4
155% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 128
157% 278 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 101%
Great: 117%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
436GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 479 477 471 469 465 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 476
Mixed 462
SusWrite 459
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 53.4
174% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
118GB free
Firmware: UH510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 48 77 45 44 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 447
Write 290
Mixed 178
SusWrite 98.2
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 7.3
54% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 76.7
DQ Mixed 15
33% 69 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C18D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.6% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 20.1
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0B49 S27D590
Typical B250 PC MATE (MS-7A72) Builds (Compare 1,653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B250 PC MATE (MS-7A72) - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $442
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback