Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 19:23
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 120
49% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 706
57% 497 Pts
64-Core 1,175
73% 1,175 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 197
Reflection 264
Parallax 294
160% 252 fps
MRender 367
Gravity 244
Splatting 193
210% 268 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 162%
Great: 204%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 97 79 77 79 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 421
Write 394
Mixed 360
SusWrite 112
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 34.5
113% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 358
267% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 124%
CT2000P3SSD8 2TB
793GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1240 1304 1432 1523 1461 1376 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,447
Write 1,608
Mixed 1,650
SusWrite 1,389
344% 1,524 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 43
155% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 627
465% 625 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 218%
Great: 417%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
499GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 364 395 415 413 405 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 409
Mixed 370
SusWrite 392
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 33
105% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 360
271% 361 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$92
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 24.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 22.2
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 1R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 11% 35 192 12 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4D U28E590
Typical TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II Builds (Compare 2,337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $483
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback