Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZC_K3605ZC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZC_K3605ZC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K3605ZC
Memory27.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateMar 08 '24 at 02:51
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 63.6
1-Core 180
2-Core 322
99% 189 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 799
84% 671 Pts
64-Core 1,162
72% 1,162 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 3058) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5161
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.3% Average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 92.5
Parallax 62.6
53% 73.3 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 57.7
Splatting 54.8
42% 51.1 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 129 86 83 93 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 2,098
Write 1,289
Mixed 1,111
SusWrite 163
257% 1,165 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 51.9
206% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 432
DQ Write 86.3
DQ Mixed 115
121% 211 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 168%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Kingston 9905744-111.A00G 39GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 44: 0P 5R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 15% 105 138 57 144 27" 2560 1369 AOC2702 Q27G2SG4
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZC_K3605ZC Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZC_K3605ZC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback