Dell XPS 8910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 8910  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0WPMFG
Memory19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '24 at 15:06
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 64.4
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 165
59% 105 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 457
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 20.3
17% 19.6 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 16.4
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 2TB
445GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM53.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 27 29 28 28 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 3,410
Write 34.5
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 26.9
184% 885 MB/s
4K Read 221
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 4.4
342% 75.9 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 229%
Great: 556%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
809GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 96 86 81 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 170
Write 148
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 82.5
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 114%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
3TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 67 76 66 74 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 111
Write 118
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 64.9
119% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36%
Great: 98%
Seagate Expansion HDD 8TB
4TB free, PID 2038
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 73 79 75 72 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 126
Write 156
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 68.5
131% 100 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1
205% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 15
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 57%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 28 60 22" 1280 720 ACR000D X223W
Typical XPS 8910 Builds (Compare 1,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $262
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback