Samsung 950QED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 950QED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP950QED-KB1US
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230203
Uptime40.7 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '24 at 00:05
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 52.7
1-Core 119
2-Core 238
72% 136 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 773
76% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,162
72% 1,162 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1AC) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3616
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 27.9
20% 26.9 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 33.5
Splatting 0.2
14% 19.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sn530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1004 1TB
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21112004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1075 831 826 831 838 839 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,282
Write 1,305
Mixed 999
SusWrite 874
251% 1,115 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 40.9
143% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 851
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 758
547% 713 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 180%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
124% Outstanding
MC Read 52.8
MC Write 49.6
MC Mixed 47.1
142% 49.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 19.7
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 124%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4159
Typical 950QED Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 950QED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback