Samsung 950QED

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 13 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 11 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 2 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Samsung 950QED (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP950QED-KB1US
Memory	5.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230203
Uptime	13 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '24 at 02:39
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1260P 4,690 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 57.5 1-Core 176 2-Core 308 94% 181 Pts	4-Core 523 8-Core 767 80% 645 Pts	64-Core 1,117 69% 1,117 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 72,765 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Sanyo(144D C1AC) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3616 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 24 Reflection 27.8 Parallax 26.3 20% 26 fps	MRender 25 Gravity 30.4 Splatting 21.2 20% 25.5 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sn530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1004 1TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 194% 716GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21112004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1395 822 618 497 566 501 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 1,516 Write 1,784 Mixed 1,350 SusWrite 733 303% 1,346 MB/s	4K Read 51.6 4K Write 182 4K Mixed 79.2 276% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,203 DQ Write 750 DQ Mixed 971 725% 975 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 255%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB 4,018 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 8 of 8 slots used 16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	122% Outstanding	MC Read 52 MC Write 45.3 MC Mixed 46.6 137% 48 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 42 SC Mixed 19.3 71% 25 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 143%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	15.5"	1536 793	SDC4159

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 950QED Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Samsung 950QED

CPU
Core i7-1260PIntelBench 85%, 4,690 samples	237x
Core i5-1240PIntelBench 83%, 2,059 samples	17x
Gen Intel Core i5-1250P12thBench 81%, 2 samples	1x

GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	243x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	3x
Titan X PascalNvidia $286Bench 121%, 8,692 samples	2x

SSD
MZVLQ512HBLU-00B 512GBSamsungBench 165%, 1,221 samples	92x
MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B 1TBSamsungBench 205%, 395 samples	51x
SDBPNPZ-512G-1004 512GBSn530Bench 191%, 222 samples	44x

RAM
K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GBSamsungBench 116%, 4,018 samples	225x
8x1GBMicronBench 115%, 283 samples	24x
K3LKCKC@BM-MGCP 8x4GBSamsungBench 129%, 524 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16