Samsung 950QED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 950QED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP950QED-KB1US
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230203
Uptime33.2 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 04:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 56.9
1-Core 180
2-Core 323
96% 187 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 819
84% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,083
67% 1,083 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1AC) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3616
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 6
4% 5.9 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 2.7
3% 4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sn530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1004 1TB
711GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21112004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1405 840 847 851 855 853 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,582
Write 1,810
Mixed 1,386
SusWrite 942
322% 1,430 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 81.2
273% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,185
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 957
720% 972 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 249%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
124% Outstanding
MC Read 55.6
MC Write 46.5
MC Mixed 45.2
140% 49.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 19.5
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 124%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 11 60 15.5" 1536 793 SDC4159
Typical 950QED Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 950QED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback