Samsung 950QED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 950QED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP950QED-KB1US
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230203
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateOct 13 '23 at 21:57
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 61.2
1-Core 185
2-Core 325
99% 190 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 917
96% 769 Pts
64-Core 1247
77% 1247 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1AC) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3616
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 25.8
18% 25.3 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 29.1
Splatting 20
20% 24.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sn530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1004 1TB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21112004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1356 822 655 573 507 385 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,544
Write 1,781
Mixed 1,275
SusWrite 717
299% 1,329 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 80.1
272% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,284
DQ Write 838
DQ Mixed 1,035
779% 1,052 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 237%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (83rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
132% Outstanding
MC Read 57.1
MC Write 48.7
MC Mixed 49.2
148% 51.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 23.1
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 132%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 0 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4159
Typical 950QED Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 950QED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback