Acer Aspire A315-58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-58  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Camellia_TL
Memory5 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230421
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '24 at 11:26
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 43.3
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 216
58% 115 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 199
20% 159 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 25.9
17% 23.6 fps
MRender 20
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 18
18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8SEP4512Q-AA 512GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI00111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1017 1046 454 355 367 363 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,897
Write 978
Mixed 982
SusWrite 600
247% 1,114 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 19.6
122% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 573
DQ Mixed 643
481% 642 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 176%
Great: 263%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P32NC4U1-BIES Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.1% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 18.4
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 15
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 15.5" 1280 720 HKC3D00
Typical Aspire A315-58 Builds (Compare 1,237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback