Acer Swift SFG14-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Swift SFG14-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Coral_RTH
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230427
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateNov 12 '23 at 03:59
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 45.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 263
74% 145 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 776
79% 640 Pts
64-Core 1,144
71% 1,144 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Acer(1025 1699) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 16.5
11% 17.6 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 17.9
18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8SEP4512Q-AA 512GB
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI00111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1480 1716 1513 1895 1952 663 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,028
Write 2,079
Mixed 1499
SusWrite 1,536
402% 1,786 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 35.7
189% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 794
DQ Write 662
DQ Mixed 727
545% 728 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 263%
Great: 263%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
121% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 52.6
MC Mixed 47.1
138% 48.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 19.4
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 121%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 54 90 14" 1440 829 SDC4181
Typical Swift SFG14-71 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Acer Swift SFG14-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback