HP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87FE
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220321
Uptime15.3 Days
Run DateJan 09 '23 at 09:35
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 62.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 220
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 534
59% 467 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 87FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3802
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.43% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 14.4
7% 11.6 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 11.7
11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.43%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8SBP3512K-AH 512GB
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 354 349 876 651 750 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1105
Write 922
Mixed 629
SusWrite 578
181% 808 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 16
114% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 621
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 349
277% 397 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 131%
Great: 191%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.4% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 19.6
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15s-fq2xxx Builds (Compare 2,184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback