Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '24 at 13:59
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 646
70% 557 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Nvidia(10DE 16CF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 203
Reflection 272
Parallax 198
166% 224 fps
MRender 276
Gravity 160
Splatting 120
144% 185 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 147%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0B-00YS70 250GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 202 207 201 205 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 313
Mixed 224
SusWrite 208
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 40
147% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 243
205% 302 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 105%
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
119GB free
Firmware: SN7872
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 175 174 170 171 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 323
Write 176
Mixed 178
SusWrite 173
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 22.4
107% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 130
111% 164 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
571GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 133 131 125 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 137
Write 132
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 131
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G KF3200C16D4/8GX 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.7% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 14 144 27" 1280 720 MSI3CA7 MSI MAG274R
Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $331
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback