MSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D22
MotherboardMSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '22 at 06:32
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 786
79% 640 Pts
64-Core 1,003
62% 1,003 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 7D22) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 8
6% 8.33 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 7
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0506A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 22 53 15 26 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 444
Write 251
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 30.5
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 1.3
46% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 80.3
DQ Write 28.8
DQ Mixed 1.2
15% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
754GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 177 176 176 177 177 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 124
Write 130
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 176
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 22.9
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 25.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22) Builds (Compare 8,137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback