Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '24 at 14:14
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 203
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 358
51% 375 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Gainward(10B0 2484) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 49%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3100TNTD 1TB
785GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM60.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1415 482 485 496 500 498 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,060
Write 1,669
Mixed 1,093
SusWrite 646
253% 1,117 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 51.4
168% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 748
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 488
374% 520 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 158%
Great: 250%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
92GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 397 299 295 299 298 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 407
Mixed 343
SusWrite 327
85% 376 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 36.7
123% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 251
217% 322 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 113%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
116GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 421 420 422 412 416 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 411
Mixed 401
SusWrite 418
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 43.2
143% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 289
237% 338 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 105%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
62GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 64 61 65 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 82.7
Write 71.4
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 63.7
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/8G KHX2400C15/8G KHX2400C15/8G KHX2400C15/8G 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 29
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 26.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 23.1
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 100 34" 2752 1129 IVM761A PL3466WQ
Typical GA-Z270-Gaming K3 Builds (Compare 2,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3 - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback