Asus H110M-C D3/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-C D3/BR (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180222
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '24 at 00:06
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$89 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	70% Very good	Memory 80.5 1-Core 99.1 2-Core 193 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 357 46% 350 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.23 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.4% Above average	Lighting 70 Reflection 73.3 Parallax 66.9 57% 70.1 fps	MRender 66.3 Gravity 70 Splatting 65.7 55% 67.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KBM 1TB 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 556GB free (System drive) Firmware: W0413A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 386 393 432 428 424 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Read 423 Write 365 Mixed 343 SusWrite 389 86% 380 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 72.7 4K Mixed 19.3 99% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 34.4 87% 179 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 185 187 187 188 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 178 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 187 108% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 18.6 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 18.9 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 16: 0P 0R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
16%	13%	61	214	59	60	21.5"	1280 720	GSM5818 E2241

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-C D3/BR Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C D3/BR

CPU
Core i3-6100Intel $51Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	18x
Core i5-6400Intel $75Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	17x
Core i5-7400Intel $89Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	6x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	9x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x
KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GBKingstonBench 48%, 866 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $79

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16