MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '24 at 12:10
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 220
69% 127 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 433
57% 426 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus Radeon RX 470
Asus(1043 0533) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13023.4001
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.5% Below average
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 57.6
Parallax 63.8
30% 52.9 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 46.4
Splatting 42
39% 49.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 44%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 120GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY28V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 101 8.8 7.4 30 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 457
Write 380
Mixed 322
SusWrite 87.1
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 11.6
92% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 16.7
62% 135 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$22
424GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 125 128 129 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 118
Write 119
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 127
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 70%
Shenzhen YongzhenWeiye 250GB
171GB free
Firmware: 0414
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 28 15 36 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 50
Write 35.4
Mixed 27
SusWrite 30.7
26% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-8GB-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 30.1
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 24.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 12 60 21.5" 1280 720 FUS083A E22T-7 LED
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback