Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Gaming 30%
Desktop 77%
Workstation 25%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '20 at 16:27
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 97%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 191
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 384
51% 382 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 70%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 37
31% 35.2 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 35.4
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vaseky V800/120G 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0226A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 383 70 55 46 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 505
Write 428
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 146
62% 283 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 25.9
113% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 2.2
81% 191 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 76%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-8GB-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 29.1
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 24.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 29%
Desktop 79%
Workstation 27%

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback