MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 203%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 284%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive428% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E12
MotherboardMSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)  (all builds)
Memory174.7 GB free of 192 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '23 at 21:27
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$520
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 66.6
1-Core 216
2-Core 431
120% 238 Pts
4-Core 726
8-Core 1,582
134% 1,154 Pts
64-Core 3,629
225% 3,629 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
MSI(1462 7E12) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.46
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
8.09% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 12.4
6% 11.2 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 21.8
12% 13.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.09%
Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 4070-$550
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
203% Outstanding
Lighting 292
Reflection 272
Parallax 289
238% 284 fps
MRender 365
Gravity 247
Splatting 193
211% 268 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 203%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$325
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3526 3461 3485 3541 3486 3484 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
428% Outstanding
Read 1,881
Write 3,626
Mixed 2,963
SusWrite 3,497
682% 2,992 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 82.6
264% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,505
DQ Write 1,061
DQ Mixed 1,286
960% 1,284 MB/s
Poor: 315%
This bench: 428%
Great: 616%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3862 3832 3783 3683 3893 3872 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
475% Outstanding
Read 2,622
Write 4,012
Mixed 2,977
SusWrite 3,820
763% 3,358 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 74.5
238% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,679
DQ Write 1,153
DQ Mixed 1435
1,066% 1,422 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 475%
Great: 592%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
14GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 32.3
Write 2.2
Mixed 4.7
11% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.9
122% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH96GX5M2B5600C40 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
195% Outstanding
MC Read 141
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 51.5
219% 76.7 GB/s
SC Read 42.7
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 38.8
119% 41.5 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 195%
Great: 195%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 0P 5R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 25% 24 218 60 60 13.2" 1280 720 GAO1320 GAOMON PD1320
History: Score 28: 0P 5R 1G 0B | Score 37: 0P 5R 4G 0B
Typical MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12) Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback