Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 272%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics186% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive366% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory50.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 08:26
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$492
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 76.9
1-Core 207
2-Core 416
120% 233 Pts
4-Core 804
8-Core 1,570
141% 1,187 Pts
64-Core 3,626
224% 3,626 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 114%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Dell(1028 3891) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
186% Outstanding
Lighting 269
Reflection 245
Parallax 275
219% 263 fps
MRender 314
Gravity 223
Splatting 168
184% 235 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 186%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2922 1864 1870 1879 1896 1891 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
366% Outstanding
Read 2,672
Write 2,844
Mixed 3,005
SusWrite 2,054
597% 2,644 MB/s
4K Read 68.1
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 92
312% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 894
DQ Write 767
DQ Mixed 876
644% 846 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 366%
Great: 508%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
309GB free
Firmware: S1111j0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1549 1557 1555 1554 287 224 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,862
Write 1,538
Mixed 1,072
SusWrite 1,121
313% 1,398 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 31
202% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 904
DQ Write 811
DQ Mixed 527
486% 747 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 239%
Great: 291%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
929GB free
Firmware: 1001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 183 186 183 181 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 182
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 184
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
176GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 157 163 161 156 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 87.7
Write 110
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 160
68% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 170 174 172 170 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 151
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 171
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 114 113 113 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 115
Write 102
Mixed 90
SusWrite 113
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3040G322x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
218% Outstanding
MC Read 135
MC Write 54.9
MC Mixed 64.5
242% 84.7 GB/s
SC Read 44.1
SC Write 57
SC Mixed 50.8
145% 50.6 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 149%
This bench: 218%
Great: 257%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 48.8" 5120 1440 SAM7053 LC49G95T
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback