Asus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 349%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 455%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics308% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive471% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI  (all builds)
Memory50.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231004
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 08:00
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$460
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 206
2-Core 425
121% 236 Pts
4-Core 847
8-Core 1,616
146% 1,232 Pts
64-Core 3,735
231% 3,735 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$960
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
308% Outstanding
Lighting 473
Reflection 448
Parallax 480
386% 467 fps
MRender 526
Gravity 393
Splatting 260
307% 393 fps
Poor: 283%
This bench: 308%
Great: 315%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$162
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3948 3903 3968 4014 4023 1298 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
471% Outstanding
Read 2,918
Write 4,138
Mixed 3,291
SusWrite 3,526
786% 3,468 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 78.9
254% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,573
DQ Write 1,097
DQ Mixed 1,339
999% 1,336 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 471%
Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6000 C30 2x32GB-$195
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
264% Outstanding
MC Read 169
MC Write 64.4
MC Mixed 74.9
294% 103 GB/s
SC Read 50.3
SC Write 74.2
SC Mixed 55.4
171% 60 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 150%
This bench: 264%
Great: 264%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 22 144 31.5" 2560 1369 GBT3204 Gigabyte M32U
Typical ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 527%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $2,628
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback