Asus P8H77-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M LE  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120528
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 17:35
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 195
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 444
48% 380 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Nvidia(10DE 0990) 2GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 372 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.06% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 1.8
4% 4.4 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 4.2
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.06%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
121GB free
Firmware: SBFK66B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 251 244 246 240 232 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.1% Average
Read 230
Write 103
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 248
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 11.3
51% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 10.7
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 13.4
10% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 102%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 319GB
118GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 4.8 7 6 9.1 9.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 62%
Amd-raid WDC WDS120G2G0A- 120GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 20 22 20 20 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 153%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HB5N-CG 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 10 60 21.5" 1920 1027 AOC2250 2250W
Typical P8H77-M LE Builds (Compare 765 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback