QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory27.9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 27.9GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory22.5 GB free of 27.9404 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 03:55
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 239
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 706
75% 598 Pts
64-Core 773
48% 773 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Asus(1043 0506) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 283
Parallax 771
184% 426 fps
MRender 542
Gravity 282
Splatting 469
355% 431 fps
Poor: 216%
This bench: 214%
Great: 293%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 480GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 205 171 214 184 170 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 429
Write 278
Mixed 292
SusWrite 191
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 17.6
56% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 80.5
DQ Mixed 48.6
62% 113 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 74%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
269GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1284 1347 1099 1407 1183 1292 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 27GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 12227 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.6% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 24.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 22
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 120 23.5" 1280 720 AUS2406 ASUS VG24VQE
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback