QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory14.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14.6GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.9 GB free of 14.6484 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '23 at 13:42
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 83.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 251
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 828
80% 657 Pts
64-Core 894
55% 894 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$246
PNY(196E 138E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.8% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 116
Parallax 120
105% 122 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.2
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 64GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,385
Write 1,029
Mixed 3,497
653% 2,970 MB/s
4K Read 94.9
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 88.5
298% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 659
492% 652 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 58%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
240GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 91 93 92 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 94.9
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 91.2
61% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
59GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 72 71 71 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 75.5
Write 55.5
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 71
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
369GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 67 69 68 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 71
Write 72.8
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 68.3
89% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
160% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x14GB
1 of 1 slots used
14GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
74.2% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.1
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 25.6" 1920 1080 HWP26F9 HP LP2475w
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback