bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory11.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory9 GB free of 11.7188 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 15:43
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User KWT-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 76.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 128
69% 111 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 131
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.17.3.5
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 27.6
16% 21.2 fps
MRender 32.6
Gravity 27.5
Splatting 29.6
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 19%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 107GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 500 443 553 644 615 447 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 1,400
Write 1251
Mixed 1,389
SusWrite 534
257% 1,143 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 30.8
107% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 75.5
DQ Write 76.2
DQ Mixed 75.9
57% 75.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 125%
Great: 177%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB Virtual RAM VMW-2048MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB Virtual RAM VMW-512MB Virtual RAM VMW-128MB Virtual RAM VMW-64MB Virtual RAM VMW-32MB 11GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
8192, 2048, 1024, 512, 128, 64, 32 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 29.8
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 26.4
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback