QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	6.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 26 '20 at 10:42
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Vega Graphics 43 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 59.1 1-Core 82.9 2-Core 161 57% 101 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 448 45% 368 Pts	64-Core 447 28% 447 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38% Below average	Lighting 43.2 Reflection 62.8 Parallax 60.2 35% 55.4 fps	MRender 61.9 Gravity 45.3 Splatting 52.2 43% 53.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 480GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 379GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 18 39 3.7 164 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 403 Write 279 Mixed 259 SusWrite 70.6 56% 253 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 17.3 4K Mixed 8.9 43% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 73.6 DQ Mixed 26.8 38% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 74%
Seagate Backup+ SL 1TB 401 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 608GB free Firmware: 0412 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 88 88 88 88 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 89.7 Write 37 Mixed 38 SusWrite 88.3 46% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x10GB 540 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1 of 1 slots used 10GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 30.8 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 20.3 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $265Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	139x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16