Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77-DS3H  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120416
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 10:46
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 173
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 453
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.9 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 79 83 80 76 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 99.3
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 79.6
64% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 74%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
216GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 62 62 63 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 72.7
Write 42.9
Mixed 48.4
SusWrite 62
42% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 67%
WD My Passport 2TB
432GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 54
Write 28.7
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 14.8
37% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
48% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 44%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
2TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 121 120 120 122 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 121
Write 59.7
Mixed 75
SusWrite 119
122% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 60%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
956GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 52.2
Write 27.3
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 13.9
36% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
53% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 52%
QNAP TR-004 DISK00 36TB
25.5TB free, PID 0013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 55.7
Write 23.9
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 13.3
35% 30 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.4
98% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 20 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM580B IPS236
Typical GA-H77-DS3H Builds (Compare 1,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback