Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive	208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	17.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211102
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '23 at 08:56
Run Duration	352 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Memory 92.9 1-Core 134 2-Core 262 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 840 80% 660 Pts	64-Core 1,463 90% 1,463 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Asus(1043 8706) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 171 Reflection 163 Parallax 164 139% 166 fps	Gravity 141 Splatting 125 117% 133 fps
Poor: 105% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 722 582 540 523 521 518 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	208% Outstanding	Read 2,335 Write 2,113 Mixed 1,739 SusWrite 568 377% 1,689 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 54.7 175% 57.1 MB/s	DQ Read 612 DQ Write 503 DQ Mixed 559 418% 558 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 208% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 437GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 8,746 Write 7,507 Mixed 7,846 1,791% 8,033 MB/s	4K Read 454 4K Write 204 4K Mixed 265 1,135% 308 MB/s	DQ Read 1,091 DQ Write 672 DQ Mixed 754 596% 839 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 310GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 153 143 145 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 400 Write 149 Mixed 203 SusWrite 142 49% 224 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 4 57% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 133%
Seagate ST8000DM005-2EH1 8TB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 833GB free Firmware: DN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 118 114 115 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 113 Write 121 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 115 67% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 104%
Seagate ST8000DM005-2EH1 8TB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2TB free Firmware: DN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 160 159 161 158 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Read 149 Write 146 Mixed 79.9 SusWrite 159 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 337% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 104%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 94 93 94 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 110 Write 123 Mixed 90 SusWrite 94.5 142% 104 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 103% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 70%
ST14000N M0018-2H4101 14TB 1.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 118 115 118 122 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.4% Average	Read 92.6 Write 86.1 Mixed 67.9 SusWrite 117 124% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.4 156% 2.57 MB/s

ST14000N M0018-2H4101 14TB 2TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 61 60 61 61 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36% Below average	Read 92.3 Write 79.7 Mixed 64.4 SusWrite 60.3 98% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.3 151% 2.17 MB/s

ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 61 61 61 62 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.3% Below average	Read 86.6 Write 86.1 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 61.4 102% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1.7 188% 3 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 93%
ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.7 0.5 1.1 1 2.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23% Poor	Read 88.7 Write 80.1 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 1.1 72% 57.5 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.3 157% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 93%
ST4000VN 000-1H4168 4TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 662GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 94 93 94 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 166 Write 159 Mixed 83.4 SusWrite 94.4 163% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 63%
ST4000VN 000-1H4168 4TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 94 93 94 95 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 135 Write 126 Mixed 75.4 SusWrite 94.5 142% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 63%
ST4000DX 001-1CE168 4TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 885GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 94 93 94 95 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 129 Write 91.8 Mixed 70.8 SusWrite 94.5 125% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.4 237% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 92,358 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	MC Read 36.7 MC Write 36.8 MC Mixed 26.2 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 8.7 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	56	60	34.1"	1280 720	GSM5AE2 LG ULTRAWIDE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	866x
Core i7-9700KIntel $259Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	133x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $292Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	108x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	296x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	110x
RTX 2080Nvidia $389Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	98x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	128x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	99x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples	66x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	71x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	56x
CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 29,525 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,068

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16