Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 171% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 170% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	175% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS XTREME
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF (all builds)
Memory	27 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191218
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '20 at 05:33
Run Duration	436 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	Memory 96.6 1-Core 153 2-Core 298 101% 183 Pts	4-Core 545 8-Core 985 92% 765 Pts	64-Core 1,514 94% 1,514 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 12FA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	175% Outstanding	Lighting 263 Reflection 216 Parallax 214 214% 231 fps	MRender 244 Gravity 188 Splatting 148 153% 193 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 175% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$180 2,580 User benchmarks, average bench 300% 279GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1106C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 980 1212 1125 950 1125 1093 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	267% Outstanding	Read 2,508 Write 1,786 Mixed 1,521 SusWrite 1,081 384% 1,724 MB/s	4K Read 53.2 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 57.7 213% 73.9 MB/s	DQ Read 957 DQ Write 627 DQ Mixed 582 491% 722 MB/s
Poor: 194% ↑ This bench: 267% Great: 379%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 613GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 465 467 469 479 476 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 430 Mixed 434 SusWrite 468 102% 455 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 91.2 4K Mixed 55.5 181% 62.5 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 356 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 133%
D4-310 TerraMaster_DAS 4TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 794GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 79 79 75 75 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 111 Write 79.3 Mixed 72.9 SusWrite 77.8 63% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 71%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 0GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 56.8 Write 8 Mixed 14.8 25% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.8 65% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 16%
H/W DISK 1 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 99GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 125 126 128 127 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.6% Good	Read 125 Write 124 Mixed 72.9 SusWrite 126 150% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 1.2 253% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 65%
H/W DISK 2 10TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 566GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 78 77 78 78 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.1% Above average	Read 152 Write 153 Mixed 85.4 SusWrite 77.8 152% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.7 204% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 55%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68MYMN1 6TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 251GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 16 17 17 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.3% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 28.9 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 17 32% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 43%
ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 6TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.2% Poor	Read 30.9 Write 32.3 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 17.1 36% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 1 251% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 93%
ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB 6.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 12 11 18 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.1% Below average	Read 27.1 Write 32.7 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 14.9 35% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 1.2 323% 4.77 MB/s

ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB 1.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 20 20 21 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.1% Poor	Read 34 Write 38 Mixed 30.6 SusWrite 20.4 41% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.1 251% 4.33 MB/s

H/W DISK 3 6TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 173GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 78 76 78 86 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40% Average	Read 104 Write 99.8 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 78.5 114% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 40%
H/W DISK 4 8TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 56GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 77 78 77 78 77 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	65.7% Good	Read 88.5 Write 154 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 78.3 137% 98.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 1 431% 4.4 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 13.2 DQ Mixed 1.1 488% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 66%
H/W DISK 1 12TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 7GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 116 Write 119 Mixed 68.7 126% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1.2 225% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 47%
H/W DISK 2 12TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 83GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.3% Average	Read 126 Write 123 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 39.7 119% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.4 230% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 95%
H/W DISK 3 12TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 11GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 37 37 37 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.8% Average	Read 122 Write 117 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 37.7 113% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 1.7 246% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 46%
H/W DISK 4 12TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 39 39 41 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.5% Average	Read 127 Write 122 Mixed 79.6 SusWrite 39.1 118% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1.6 240% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 3x16GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 3 of 4 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 30.5 MC Mixed 24.6 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 20.6 SC Write 30.1 SC Mixed 27.7 75% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 51.8 77% 51.8 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	308x
Core i9-9900KSIntelBench 99%, 12,840 samples	29x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $285Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	22x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	99x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	44x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	34x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	62x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	38x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	23x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	25x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	11x
CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 91%, 18,655 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16