Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME ENCORE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME ENCORE  (all builds)
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateNov 03 '21 at 17:14
Run Duration432 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10980XE-$1,100
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 71
1-Core 141
2-Core 285
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 932
83% 703 Pts
64-Core 2,410
149% 2,410 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2384) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
157% Outstanding
Lighting 212
Reflection 206
Parallax 233
173% 217 fps
MRender 262
Gravity 218
Splatting 161
169% 213 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 157%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 240GB-$261
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 174 183 182 164 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 409
Write 218
Mixed 241
SusWrite 173
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 36.7
138% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 236
174% 229 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 93%
Samsung 860 QVO 4TB-$250
421GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 275 162 162 160 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 443
Mixed 378
SusWrite 220
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 40.2
146% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 351
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$540
7.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 378 394 391 419 419 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 452
Mixed 411
SusWrite 400
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 44.9
155% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 352
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$229
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 142 141 140 143 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
5TB free
Firmware: AR13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 114 95 114 110 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
3TB free
Firmware: AR13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 131 140 144 146 139 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate ST18000NM000J-2TV103 18TB
12TB free
Firmware: SN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 212 214 215 216 216 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 10% Great: 10%
Seagate ST18000NM000J-2TV103 18TB
12.5TB free
Firmware: SN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 247 250 254 254 253 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 10% Great: 10%
H/W DISK 2 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 80 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 98.4
Write 97.3
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 79.8
110% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 59%
H/W DISK 4 4TB
115GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 79.3
Write 80.7
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 0.3
60% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
2GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 4.2 3.7 3.7 4.2 3.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 16.5
Write 1
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 3.7
5% 5.73 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3
204% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 13%
H/W DISK 1 12TB
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.1% Average
Read 186
Write 160
Mixed 95.4
SusWrite 3.5
135% 111 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.3
278% 7.87 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 47%
H/W DISK 3 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 79 81 81 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 117
Write 122
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 80.2
130% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 56%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
30GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 6.5 14 5.4 6.7 8.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Read 12.9
Write 10
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 7.8
14% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX4M4K3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 53.6
MC Mixed 35.2
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 9.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME ENCORE Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME ENCORE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $2,393
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback