GPU GWTN141-10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGPU GWTN141-10  (all builds)
MotherboardGPU GPU Company
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210831
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 23:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 134
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 392
42% 335 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1C6C 078B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 23.8
15% 21.7 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 15.6
17% 22 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
W800sh 512G SSD 512GB
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09951
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 188 284 148 305 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 367
Write 409
Mixed 379
SusWrite 222
78% 344 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 21.5
92% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 279
203% 262 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 31.5
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 15
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 19 22 1 0 14" 1280 720 BOE081D
Typical GWTN141-10 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: GPU GWTN141-10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback