GPU GWTN141-10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGPU GWTN141-10  (all builds)
MotherboardGPU GPU Company
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 06:12
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 53.9
1-Core 135
2-Core 212
73% 134 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 433
48% 381 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1C6C 078B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 20.1
13% 19.3 fps
MRender 20.2
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 16.5
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
W800sh 512G SSD 512GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN09948
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 380 358 374 378 376 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 392
Write 378
Mixed 361
SusWrite 372
85% 376 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 30.2
110% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 254
192% 257 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
72.1% Very good
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 23.7
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 12.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GWTN141-10 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: GPU GWTN141-10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback